> > So I replaced that file with a 732 KB file.
> > It's loads up real quick, but isn't the quality that I'd like to
> > present on my web page.
The quality of the "small" file seems totally fine to me 🙂 But I'm
coming to understand that not everyone is willing to live with
highly optimized video as I am…
Here's a little system I've been thinking about: have a server side
system that counts hits (or even measures bandwidth), and then serve
the high quality file as long as you can every month, and by the end
of the month when you start running out of bandwidth, serve the low
quality file instead. Should be pretty doable with a simple