Re: [videoblogging] INdTV

——=_Part_2473_3324364.1096436994705
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't know if it's fair to judge them strictly on content yet. Yes,
their stuff is really gimmicky at this point, and I hope that will
change once they get their footing. It will partly depend on the
talent they recruit and how much control/constraints they exert on the
content that those people produce. Regardless, I think there is room
in this medium for all sorts — independent and corporate.

At this point, I'm more interested in the implementation. Are they
doing something that makes videoblogging more accessible for media
creators/consumers? Whether its in terms of tools for publishing,
sharing, archiving, syndicating, searching, etc.. How does it foster
this emerging community?

–Josh

On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, at 01:27AM, Shannon Noble <sn@…> wrote:

>
><<Original Attached>>

—————————-
Joshua Kinberg
jkinberg@…
(201) 328-4547
—————————

——=_Part_2473_3324364.1096436994705
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [videoblogging] INdTV</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<FONT FACE="Verdana">On 9/28/04 10:18 PM, "M. Sean Gilligan" <seanlist@…> wrote:<BR>
</FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana"><BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="New York"><TT>Shannon, you're too old to be a "young person", right?  <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</TT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="New York"><TT>I’m going to tell them I’m a 17 year old female. Then I’m going to tell them “I see dead people”.<BR>
</TT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"><BR>
</FONT>

<br>

</BODY>
</HTML>

——=_Part_2473_3324364.1096436994705–