Re: [videoblogging] New Post

Now that you pointed that out I will change it. At the time I was confused
enough by the procedure of getting something online plus figuring out what
the licensing meant….well I pushed a couple buttons. Yours too. I'll fix
it if that's able. I don't quite understand the licensing concept anyways.

On 9/14/04 10:35 AM, "Andreas Haugstrup" <videoblog@…> wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 10:51:44 -0700, Shannon Noble <sn@…> wrote:
>
>> http://x.nnon.tv/blog/_archives/2004/9/11/138589.html
>>
>> Using footage from some of you here.
>
> I watched it when you put it on archive.org earlier. There I was
> disappointed to see that you had chosen to make it available under the
> NoDerivs license. Was that a mistake or why did you choose this?
>
> It just seems wrong to me that while you are counting on others to provide
> you footage, you don't want any to reuse your material.
>
> Remember that if you are using footage license with a sharealike license
> you have to make your work available under the same license. This could
> lead to some interesting problems where a movie is made up of clips with
> different sharealike licenses…
>
> – Andreas

–This is Vlog: http://x.nnon.tv/