Re: [videoblogging] no video iPod?

But doesn't rel="alternate" describe an alternate version of the
container? Or is that only for link and not a tags?

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:

>
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:30:50 -0400, Joshua Kinberg <jkinberg@…>
> wrote:
>
>> Andreas: This seems like a better use of rel="alternate"
>
> It's one very good use of rel="alternate" to create links to different
> media formats. Like I think I wrote yesterday:
>
> <ul id="movielist">
> <li><a href="movie.mov" rel="alternate"
> type="video/quicktime">Quicktime</a></li>
> <li><a href="movie.mp4" rel="alternate" type="video/mp4">MPEG 4</a></li>
> <li><a href="movie.3gp" rel="alternate"
> type="insert-content-type">3GPP</a></li>
> </ul>
>
> The definition of rel="alternate" has already been set down in the HTML
> spec. It just designates multiple versions of the same resource. It's not
> limited to different file types, but also translations.
>
> —
> <URL:http://www.solitude.dk/>
> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>