Re: [videoblogging] The INternet of Video

–B_3178086317_162497
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

With out a doubt you will eventually see a flurry of start-up
post-dot.comm=
ers who=B9d either ripped off or failed investors in an rss
feeding frenzy =
of =B3video=B2 once this all gets going. Instead of being limited
to 800 ch=
annels of TV garbage we will have unlimited quantities of useless,
redundan=
t, visual crud. Only the savy who know how to sift through the
garbage to f=
ind the gems will really be the winners.

On 9/15/04 9:19 AM, "Jay Dedman"=
<jay@…> wrote:

>>>>>> > > >>>=A0 <warning, grumpy mood>
>>>>>> > >=
>>>=A0 congratulations on stating the bleeding obvious.
>>>>>> > > >>>=
=A0 < /warning, grumpy mood>
>
>> > I found it condescending.
>
>>>> > > =
> that's what i like about this group.
>>>> > > > yep.
>>>> > > > we spo=
t the bullshit.
>
>>> > > I'm lost.
>>> > > Why do his words upset you?
=
>>> > > Shouldn't we be happy that he's talking about the same things we a=
re
>>> > > talking about?
>
> in light of what everyone is saying…
> le=
t's read it again.
>
> "Now that video can be produced cheaply and with re=
asonable production
> values, and now that it can be affordably distributed=
and perhaps even
> easily monetized, will we see an emerging new class of =
"video site
> producers" rather than classic textual content. In 1994 when =
the Web
> really emerged, it helped bring forth an explosion in the amount =
and
> richness of text that was produced and available globally. I believe
=
> we're at the front-end of a very similar curve in video, and this world
>=
/ opportunity is not going to look very much like how we as consumers
> fi=
nd, acquire and view video today."
>
> I just latch onto "easily monetized=
" and "opportunities" and "consumers" and
> "front-end"…
> I just dont sh=
are the same direction this guy seems to be hinting towards.
> a web of vid=
eo that helps keep selling the same old stuff i hate.
> i want video on the=
web to show me things ive never seen before.
> i want video on the web to =
let us talk to each other in new ays (like in
> this group).
> I dont want =
Coke "videos" by made 5th graders(real people so its honest!!)
> on their b=
logs as part of some contest.
>
> i guess when anything new begins, its ea=
sy to be an idealist becasue this
> world is still in our minds.
> the rule=
s and playing field is being defined and we got to shout about what
> its g=
oing to look like.

–This is Vlog: http://x.nnon.tv/

–B_3178086317_162497
Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [videoblogging] The INternet of Video</TITLE>
</HE=
AD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE=3D"Verdana">With out a doubt you will eventually see =
a flurry of start-up post-dot.commers who’d either ripped off or fail=
ed investors in an rss feeding frenzy of “video” once this all =
gets going. Instead of being limited to 800 channels of TV garbage we will =
have unlimited quantities of useless, redundant, visual crud. Only the savy=
who know how to sift through the garbage to find the gems will really be t=
he winners. <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 9/15/04 9:19 AM, "Jay Dedman" <j=
ay@…> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"New York"><=
TT>> >  >>>=A0 <warning, grumpy mood><BR>
> &g=
t;  >>>=A0 congratulations on stating the bleeding obvious.<B=
R>
> >  >>>=A0 < /warning, grumpy mood><BR>
<BR>
=
> I found it condescending.<BR>
<BR>
> >  > that's what i =
like about this group.<BR>
> >  > yep.<BR>
> >  &g=
t; we spot the bullshit.<BR>
<BR>
> >  I'm lost.<BR>
> > &=
nbsp;Why do his words upset you?<BR>
> >  Shouldn't we be happy =
that he's talking about the same things we are<BR>
> >  talking =
about?<BR>
<BR>
in light of what everyone is saying…<BR>
let's read it ag=
ain.<BR>
<BR>
"Now that video can be produced cheaply and with reasona=
ble production<BR>
values, and now that it can be affordably distributed an=
d perhaps even<BR>
easily monetized, will we see an emerging new class of &=
quot;video site<BR>
producers" rather than classic textual content. In=
1994 when the Web<BR>
really emerged, it helped bring forth an explosion i=
n the amount and<BR>
richness of text that was produced and available globa=
lly. I believe<BR>
we're at the front-end of a very similar curve in video,=
and this world<BR>
/ opportunity is not going to look very much like how w=
e as consumers<BR>
find, acquire and view video today."<BR>
<BR>
I jus=
t latch onto "easily monetized" and "opportunities" and=
"consumers" and <BR>
"front-end"…<BR>
I just dont sh=
are the same direction this guy seems to be hinting towards.<BR>
a web of v=
ideo that helps keep selling the same old stuff i hate.<BR>
i want video on=
the web to show me things ive never seen before.<BR>
i want video on the w=
eb to let us talk to each other in new ays (like in <BR>
this group).<BR>
I=
dont want Coke "videos" by made 5th graders(real people so its h=
onest!!) <BR>
on their blogs as part of some contest.<BR>
<BR>
i guess when=
anything new begins, its easy to be an idealist becasue this <BR>
world is=
still in our minds.<BR>
the rules and playing field is being defined and w=
e got to shout about what <BR>
its going to look like.<BR>
</TT></FONT></BL=
OCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"New York"><TT><BR>
</TT></FONT><FONT FACE=3D"Verdana=
"><BR>
–This is Vlog: http://x.nnon.tv/ <BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>
=

–B_3178086317_162497–