Re: [videoblogging] Vblog content

On 09/11/2004, at 3:57 AM, Jay dedman wrote:

> so what my point?
> i bet videoblogging would benefit from regular, formatted "shows".
> but i bet people in this group will bristle to this idea.
> and I like that my videoblog is kind of all over then place.
> as more poeple join, and tools become easier, some poeple will
> probbaly do just this and probably get pretty popular.

<bristle on>
yep. don't call thtat video blogging. call it community access net tv.
or something. but not video blogging. it's a blog. personal,
multivocal, idiosyncratic, did i say personal?

if you want audience, serialisation, and 'shows' go for it, use
syndication. i think using aggregation to achieve this is 1000% more
interesting than centralising which is what the above sort of models.
blogs work because they're decnetralised. why reintroduce old media
structures into a distributed network that works because *all* bits are
distributed?

this is where the rss/aggregation stuff is critical. imagine we all
made a 60 second bit called "Christmas" and then aggregated that.
that's a show. that's a new sort of show and that is what we ought to
be worrying about

cheers
Adrian Miles

+++++++++++++++++++++
http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/vlog/